Why is there no gameObject.parent?

Question

Is there any reason for this?...

It seems sort of confusing that the Transform component deals with hierarchy (parent, childCount, DetachChildren, etc), when it mostly deals with location/rotation/scale, and is a part of the gameObject (which is a container for components and child objects)

I know you can just do gameObject.transform.parent... but that can get annoying when you are storing variables and keeping track of objects and constantly have to switch between gameobject and transform references...

Does anyone know the reason for this? or at least why there is no built-in inherited version to make gameObject.parent work?

Answer 1

Answer by zombience · Oct 23, 2013 at 08:27 PM

That's a design decision unity made.

If you really want to have that functionality, here's a class that will help you:

 public static class ParentFinder
 {
     
     public static Transform parent(this GameObject obj)
     {
         return obj.transform.parent;
     }
 }

include the file ParentFinder.cs in any project you make, and now all gameObjects will have an accessible method called "parent" which will return the gameobject's transform's parent.

If you're going to be doing a lot of this per frame (like flocking hundreds of objects or something), you'll want to create a direct reference to the transform and the transform's parent.

3 Show 2 · Share

Jamora · Oct 23, 2013 at 08:51 PM 1

Share

This is called an extension method, in case the OP wants to read up on them.

mdolnik · Oct 23, 2013 at 09:09 PM 0

Share

Thanks, that method may be useful. I know there are many options for work-a-rounds, I was more curious on the design decisions by Unity... I guess this should have been posted in a discussion.

Why is there no gameObject.parent?

1 Reply

Unity Answers is in Read-Only mode

Follow this Question

Related Questions