2D Gameplay... planes or cubes?

Question

Hi there,

I was planning on putting together a 2d game, and I was wondering on the best way to go about making platforms. I was originally planning on have everything as a plane, but I'd like to use some physics and it seems that getting planes to collide can be trouble. With that in mind, should I go about making my platforms using meshes with a depth value of 1 (perhaps with the back and bottom faces deleted)... or is there a better method?

Any advise would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks!

Answer 1

Best Answer

Answer by duck · Dec 05, 2009 at 12:24 AM

How about this:

Create a plane game object
Remove the collider component from the plane
Add a box collider component instead
Make the whole thing into a "platform" prefab
Use the prefab to build your levels :)

Add comment · Show 10 · Share

Stelimar · Dec 05, 2009 at 12:47 AM 2

Share

Why not create a plane object, remove the mesh collider, and add a box collider ins$$anonymous$$d? That way you just have one GameObject, rather than 3 (the plane, the box, and the parent)

duck ♦♦ · Dec 05, 2009 at 12:51 AM 0

Share

yes, better idea! I was thinking that you couldn't add a box collider to a plane - but you're right, you can! (although there wasn't a third GO in my suggestion, just two)

duck ♦♦ · Dec 05, 2009 at 12:54 AM 0

Share

edited answer to reflect stelimar's suggestion

Jessy · Dec 05, 2009 at 07:02 AM 0

Share

I don't recommend using the Unity plane. It contains 200 triangles. You only need 2.

duck ♦♦ · Dec 05, 2009 at 08:37 AM 0

Share

Yes, if the triangle count starts to become an issue, this is something worth considering - however my feeling is that with a significant number of objects, draw calls will become the bottleneck much sooner than tri count, which would force the move to a different method of displaying the level platforms altogether.

Show more comments

Answer 2

Answer by Design3.com · Dec 04, 2009 at 09:53 PM

Unity supplies a 2D Platformer tutorial here. If you use an orthographic camera an align your platforms-as-cubes to it, they'll appear to have no depth. It all depends on the look you're going for, so I'd read the tutorial, which talks about physics a bit, and see how it applies to what you're making.

This is an example of a 2D game without perspective made with Unity.

Here's another.

Add comment · Show 1 · Share

Disaster · Dec 04, 2009 at 10:05 PM 0

Share

Hi. Thanks very much for your reply. I have given that tutorial a good read. My main query is that I'd prefer to use planes (less faces == more power!) but I don't want to use them at the cost of dodgy physics. Sorry, perhaps my question wasn't very clear.

Answer 3

Answer by Jessy · Dec 04, 2009 at 10:25 PM

The physics system doesn't work with planes, and isn't tied to the rendering. Therefore, you'd probably be best off using textures quads for graphics, and sphere, capsule, and box colliders as appropriate. Make the box as deep as you like!

Add comment · Show 2 · Share

duck ♦♦ · Dec 05, 2009 at 12:27 AM 0

Share

Small note - the physics system does work with planes - you can collide rigidbodys against them, just not use them as rigidbodys themselves. But they won't behave nicely as platforms if you try and balance objects on them edge-on!

Jessy · Dec 05, 2009 at 03:55 AM 0

Share

It's an issue of semantics, I suppose, but I say it doesn't work with planes. You have four primitives to work with: sphere, capsule, box, triangle (mesh). You can "make a plane" out of a box or triangles (I suppose one could do if you stretched it out enough), but ultimately, no planes.

2D Gameplay... planes or cubes?

3 Replies

Your answer

Welcome to Unity Answers

Follow this Question

Related Questions